Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Research Articles

[Clinical outcome of combined over-the-top reconstruction with modified Lemaire procedure in one-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of over-the-top (OTT) reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) combined with the modified Lemaire technique in one-stage ACL revision. Methods: It's a retrospective study. The clinical data of 37 patients who underwent one-stage revision of ACL using OTT combined with modified Lemaire technique from April 2020 to May 2023 in the Department of Sports Medicine of Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Dalian University were retrospectively analyzed. There were 28 males and 9 females with a mean age of (32.7±5.7) years. The postoperative knee function and surgical revision effect were evaluated by subjective and objective evaluation indexes of the knee joint before and 3 months and 24 months after surgery. The subjective evaluation indexes included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score; and the objective evaluation indexes included the anterior-posterior static displacement distance of the tibia, tibia-femur relative rotation angle, the Lachman test, the axial shift test, and the ratio of the loss of muscle strength of the lower limb. Results: At the final follow-up, all patients returned to pre-injury motor level, with significant improvements in IKDC scores (45.3±6.8 preoperatively, 67.5±4.7 and 93.2±2.3 at 3 months and 2 years after the operation, respectively), Lysholm scores (57.2±2.6 preoperatively, 72.6±2.9 and 89.7±3.7 at 3 months and 2 years after the operation, respectively), and Tegner scores (3.1±0.7 preoperatively, 4.9±0.6 and 5.8±1.3 at 3 months and 2 years after the operation, respectively) (all P<0.001). The anterior-posterior static displacement distance of the tibia reduced significantly [from (5.2±0.5) mm before the operation to (1.4±0.5) mm at 2 years postoperatively) (P<0.001)]; and the relative rotation angle of the tibia-femur restored to the normal physiological range, it was reduced from 6.2°±1.2° before the operation to 1.7°±0.3° 2 years after (P<0.001). The Lachman test and axial shift test at 2 years postoperatively were all negative. The muscle strength loss ratio of the affected lower limb was significantly better than that before the operation (P<0.001). Conclusion: The use of OTT reconstruction combined with modified Lemaire technique for revision of ACL in patients with ACL reconstruction failure can circumvent the tunnel problem for one-stage revision and better restore the stability and function of the knee joint, with ideal clinical results.

Lower anxiety level to perform movements after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis compared to without lateral extra-articular tenodesis.

To evaluate the anxiety level to perform movements in patients after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) compared to patients after revision ACLR without LET. Ninety patients who underwent revision ACLR with ipsilateral bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and with a minimum of 12months follow-up were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who received revision ACLR in combination with LET (revision ACLR_LET group; mean follow-up: 29.4months, range: 12-80months), and patients who received revision ACLR without LET (revision ACLR group; mean follow-up: 61.1months, range: 22-192months). All patients filled in a questionnaire about anxiety level related to physical activity and sports, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form (IKDCsubjective), and the Tegner Activity Score. Patients in the revision ACLR_LET group had a significantly lower anxiety level to perform movements than patients in the revision ACLR group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in KOOS, IKDCsubjective, and Tegner Activity Scores. Patients who received LET in addition to revision ACLR have a lower anxiety level to perform movements than patients with revision ACLR alone, despite non-different subjective functional outcomes. Retrospective cohort study, Level of evidence: III.

Computer patient-specific 3D modeling and custom-made guides for revision ACL surgery.

Revision Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a challenging surgery occurring in 3-24% of primary reconstructions. A meticulous planning to study the precise size and location of both femoral and tibial bone tunnels is mandatory. The aim of the study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-operator differences in the decision-making process between experienced surgeons after they were asked to make pre-operative planning for ACL revision reconstruction with the use of both the CT scan and a 3D printed model of the knee. Data collected from 23 consecutive patients undergoing revision of ACLR for graft failure at a single Institute between September 2018 and February 2020 were prospectively reviewed. The double-blinded collected data were presented to three board-certificate attending surgeons. Surgeons were asked to decide whether to perform one-stage or two-stage revision ACLR based on the evaluation of the CT scan images and the 3D printed custom-made models at two different rounds, T0 and T1 respectively, seven days apart one from the other. Inter-operator consensus following technical mistake was 52% at T0 and 56% at T1 using the CT scans, meanwhile concordance was 95% at T0 and 94% at T1 using the 3D models. Concordance between surgeons following new knee injury was 66% at T0 and 70% at T1 using CT scans, while concordance was 96% both at T0 and T1 using 3D models. Intra-operative variability using 3D models was extremely low: concordance at T0 and T1 was 98%. McNamar test showed a statistical significance in the use of 3D model for preoperative planning (p < 0.005). 3D printed model reliability resulted to be higher compared to CT as intra-operator surgery technique selection was not modified throughout time from T0 to T1 (p < 0.005). The use of 3D printed models had the most impact when evaluating femoral and tibial tunnels, resulting to be a useful instrument during pre-operative planning of revision ACLR between attending surgeons with medium-high workflow.

[Research progress of femoral bone tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

To review the concept and methods of femoral bone tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, in order to provide a reference for clinical treatment. The relevant literature on the concept and methods of femoral bone tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction in domestic and international research was extensively reviewed. The position of the femoral bone tunnel is a key factor in determining the prognosis of ACL reconstruction. The concept of femoral bone tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction has experienced isometric reconstruction, anatomical reconstruction, Ribbon-like theory, I.D.E.A.L. theory, and nearly isometric reconstruction theory. The femoral bone tunnel positioning technique is also changing with the in-depth study of the anatomy and biomechanics of the ACL, and each bone tunnel positioning technique has its own advantages and disadvantages. Over-The-Top technique is now mainly used for ACL revision; the clock-face positioning method is basically no longer applicable due to the large error, poor stability, and low retrievability; the bone landmarks positioning method (the lateral condyle of the femur's Resident's ridge and bifurcation ridge, and the the apex of the deep cartilage), which is now mostly used clinically due to the more constant anatomical landmarks. The quadrant method under X-ray fluoroscopy is more cumbersome to implement intraoperatively, so it is mainly used for academic research; computer navigation-assisted positioning has gradually become popular in recent years, which is highly accurate, avoids the influence of human factors on the positioning of the bone tunnel, and has a very good prospect of application; three-dimensional printing-assisted positioning technology, which is accurate in positioning, with a high degree of reproducibility and a short learning curve. The concept of femoral bone tunnel positioning for ACL reconstruction has undergone several evolutions, reflecting the deepening of the understanding of ACL and the improvement of the clinical results of reconstruction. The precision, personalization, and intelligence of positioning techniques are the focus of current and future development.

Italian research on anterior cruciate ligament: a bibliometric analysis.

This study analysed thetrend of publications on anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) in Italy. It was hypothesised that publications on this topic have quickly increased in recent years due to increased knowledge of both clinical and radiological pathology. PubMed and Scopus were accessed on 29/11/2023. This retrieved 838 articles from PubMed and 1050 from Scopus. We analysed the top 10 authors, and journals in publication numbers, citation numbers, and citations per year. We have also looked at the top 10 institutions publishing on anterior cruciate ligament from Scopus as PubMed does not give this information in the output. Data mining was performed using the Orange software, Mac version 3.32.0 ( https://orangedatamining.com/ ) from the titles of all articles. A word cloud analysis of titles, authors, journals and universities was performed. The peak of citations was in 2017 with 1529, whilst the peak of publications was in 2019 with 59 articles published. Analysing the number of publications and citations for the journal, the most impacted journal is Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy with 5472 citations and 183 articles, followed by The American Journal of Sports Medicine, with 2722 citations and 56 articles and Arthroscopy with 1990 citations and 62 articles. Considering also international collaborations, the most cited author is Della Villa F. in 2020 with 43.67 citationsper year.The Italian author with the major number of publications is Zaffagnini S. with 39 articles, whilst the author with the higher number of citations is Aglietti P. with 1612 citations. ACL reconstruction has gained growing interest amongst the scientific community. Publications and citations presented a rising trend, the majority of the highly cited papers were contributed by few centres, and clinical trials were the most cited study designs. The long-term outcomes of ACL lesions have attracted interest. The authors hypothesised that shortly there will be an increase in articles analysing the results of ACL revisions, the use of lateral extra-articular tenodesis, and meniscus transplants. Cross-Sectional Study.

The Periosteum–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft for Anatomic, Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Press-Fit Tibial Fixation

Optimal graft choice and fixation technique are still ongoing topics of debate for primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Interference screws are frequently used as graft fixation devices but can sometimes lead to tunnel widening, cyst formation, chronic inflammation, screw breakage, and persistent pain. Tibial tunnel widening is of special concern because it is often associated with graft failure. This technical note introduces a graft technique with a periosteum–patellar tendon–bone autograft and a press-fit tibial fixation approach that could be a viable option for secure anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction while offering the possibility of a quicker postoperative recovery, less pain, and a quicker return to everyday activities.

Mid-term Results of a Single-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Analysis of 36 Cases

Background. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is becoming more and more common in the knee surgery due to the annual increase in the number of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Choosing the most suitable graft and determining the staging of the surgical treatment by preoperative assessment of the possibility of performing the most anatomical revision canals and their interposition with the primary canals are the main factors that influence treatment results.&#x0D; Aim of the study — comparative assessment of the results of using hamstring tendon and peroneus longus tendon autografts in a one-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.&#x0D; Methods. A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 36 patients who underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed. The patients were divided into two groups: in the patients of the study group (n = 19) a peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft was used, in the comparison group (n = 17) a hamstring tendon autograft (HT) was applied. Subjective and objective evaluation using the KOOS, IKDC, and Lysholm scales was performed, and position of the central entry points of the primary and revision canals was determined.&#x0D; There were no statistically significant differences in the objective assessment of the knee joint stability. Significantly better results of subjective assessment of the knee function according to the Lysholm and KOOS scales were obtained in the PLT group (p = 0.042 and p0.001, respectively). Position of revision canals corresponded to the standard values, but position of the femoral canal had a slight cranial and anterior displacement. It was also found that the PLT graft diameter was statistically significantly larger than the HT graft diameter (p0.001).&#x0D; Results. There were no statistically significant differences in the objective assessment of the knee joint stability. Significantly better results of subjective assessment of the knee function according to the Lysholm and KOOS scales were obtained in the PLT group (p = 0.042 and p0.001, respectively). Position of revision canals corresponded to the standard values, but position of the femoral canal had a slight cranial and anterior displacement. It was also found that the PLT graft diameter was statistically significantly larger than the HT graft diameter (p0.001).&#x0D; Conclusion. One-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a safe and effective surgical procedure providing satisfactory objective and subjective clinical results. Use of peroneus longus tendon autograft allows to obtain better results in comparison with the hamstring tendon autograft.

Over-the-Top Double-Bundle Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique With Hybrid Hamstring Tendon Autograft-Allograft and Associated Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis

Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) presents many technical challenges that are not commonly seen in primary ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this article is to describe an alternative technique consisting of over-the-top double-bundle ACL revision combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis using hybrid hamstring tendon autograft-allograft. This technique provides a valid treatment option in ACL revision surgery.

Difference of Knee Strength Recovery Between Revision and Primary ACL Reconstruction.

Different grafting procedures are available to restore knee stability after revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We compared knee strength recovery between ACL revision surgery and primary reconstruction. One hundred and ten patients with ACL revision surgery were matched with 110 patients with primary reconstruction based on the graft procedure. The isokinetic knee strength had been assessed for the first 9 months post-surgery. Knee laxity, function, and activity score were also evaluated. Limb symmetry index for knee extensor and flexor strength was not different at 4-, 6- and 9-months post-surgery between revision surgery and primary reconstruction. These results depended on ipsilateral or contralateral graft choice. Ipsilateral hamstring tendon (HT) and contralateral bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) graft procedures were similar for a revision of a BPTB graft failure. Contralateral HT procedure was better than ipsilateral BPTB procedure for a revision of a HT graft failure. The early recovery of isokinetic knee strength after ACL revision surgery regardless of the HT or BPTB procedures, was similar to the recovery after primary ACL reconstruction with the same graft technique. These results apparently depended on a temporary quadriceps arthrogenic muscle inhibition and on a persistent donor site morbidity, concerning the new and the previous grafts, respectively.

Less Subsequent Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Following Primary Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone ACL Reconstruction with Suture Tape Augmentation—A Retrospective Comparative Therapeutic Trial With 5-Year Follow-up

Less Subsequent Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Following Primary Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone ACL Reconstruction with Suture Tape Augmentation—A Retrospective Comparative Therapeutic Trial With 5-Year Follow-up

Revision ACL reconstruction in female athletes: current concepts

The challenge of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction lies in its complexity, varied presentation, and technical intricacies. A successful ACL reconstruction should allow patients to safely return to preinjury activities. However, it is only sometimes simple, and many risk factors and concurrent pathologies come into play. Evaluating and analysing the cause of failure and associated conditions is paramount to addressing them effectively. Despite a plethora of research and improvements in knowledge and technology, e gaps exist in issues such as optimal techniques of revision surgery, graft options, fixation, concurrent procedures, rehabilitation and protocol for return to sports of high-level athletes. Female athletes need additional focus since they are at higher risk of re-injury, suboptimal clinical outcomes, and lower rates of return to sport following revision reconstruction. Our understanding about injury prevention and the protection of ACL grafts in female athletes needs to be improved. This review focuses on the current state of revision ACL surgery in female athletes and provides recommendations and future directions for optimising outcomes in this high-risk group.

Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 6-Year Follow-up Results from the MARS Cohort

Objectives: Meniscal preservation has been demonstrated to contribute to long term knee health and has been a successful intervention in the isolated and ACL reconstructed patient. The long-term results of meniscus repair in the setting of revision ACL reconstruction have yet to be documented. The purpose of this study is to report the incidence of meniscal repair failures at 6-year follow-up in a cohort of patients who underwent concurrent revision ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair. Methods: All revision ACL reconstructions with concomitant meniscal repair cases from a multicenter group between 2006 and 2011 were selected. Six-year follow-up was obtained by both phone and email to determine whether any subsequent surgery had occurred to either knee since their initial revision ACL reconstruction. If so, operative reports were obtained, whenever possible, to verify pathologic condition and treatment. Results: In total, 221 patients from 1234 revision ACL reconstructions underwent concurrent meniscal repairs (18% of the cohort). There were 238 repairs performed: 173 medial and 65 lateral. The vast majority of these repairs (n=181; 76%) were performed with an all-inside technique. Baseline patient and surgical characteristics of this group are reported (Tables 1, 2). Six-year surgical follow-up was obtained on 77% (171/221) of the cohort. Overall, the meniscal repair failure rate defined as reoperation was 13% (31/235) at 6 years. Of the 31 failures, 28 were medial (24 all-inside, 4 inside-out; 16% failure rate) and 3 were lateral (2 all-inside, 1 inside-out; 4.6% failure rate; Table 2). Three medial failures were treated in conjunction with a subsequent repeat revision reconstruction. The mean (SD) time to failure for the medial repairs was 2.6 (1.7) years, while the time to failure for the lateral repairs was 1.6 (1.8) years. Medial tears underwent reoperation for failure at a statistically significant higher rate than lateral tears (16% versus 4.6%; p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: Meniscus repair in the revision ACL setting is a successful treatment option when clinically indicated with low failure rates. At 6-year follow-up, overall meniscal failure rate as defined by reoperation was 13% in this revision cohort. Failure rates for medial tears (16%) were higher than for lateral tears (4.6%), which aligns with previous studies both in the revision and primary setting.

A Lateral Extra-articular Procedure Reduces the Failure Rate of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Without Increasing Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Lateral extra-articular procedures are becoming increasingly popular in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, especially in patients with persistent rotatory instability and in a high-risk population. However, few studies have investigated the outcomes of the lateral extra-articular procedure as an associated procedure in an ACL revision (R-ACLR) setting and its benefit with respect to isolated intra-articular reconstruction. Hypothesis: Lateral extra-articular procedures reduce the failure rate of revision ACL reconstruction (R-ACLR). Purpose: To compare subjective outcomes, knee stability, and failure and complication rates between patients who underwent ACL revision with and without an associated lateral extra-articular procedure. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, Cochrane, and OVID databases was performed on September 2022 in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Eligible studies were trials directly comparing patients who had isolated ACL revision with patients who had ACL revision associated with lateral extra-articular procedures at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. A meta-analysis was performed, and bias and the quality of the evidence were rated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Eight studies were included: a total of 334 patients were treated with isolated revision (isolated (R-ACLR)) and 342 treated with combined revision and a lateral extra-articular procedure (combined (R-ACLR)). For the failure rate, the meta-analysis showed a significantly decreased relative risk reduction of 54% (P = .004) in patients with combined (R-ACLR) with respect to isolated R-ACL, whereas no difference in complication rate was observed. The combined (R-ACLR) group demonstrated a decreased risk ratio of 50% (P = .002) for having a positive pivot-shift test result and a relative risk reduction of 68% (P = .003) for having a grade 2-3 pivot shift when compared with the isolated (R-ACLR) group. Finally, no significant differences were observed among the lateral extra-articular procedures. Conclusion: The addition of a lateral extra-articular procedure to revision ACL significantly reduced the failure rate and postoperative pivot shift without increasing the complication rate. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction and a lateral extra-articular procedure with iliotibial band were effective in improving the outcomes of revision ACL reconstruction. Further high-level studies could help to clarify which subgroup of patients could particularly benefit from an anterolateral procedure in the context of ACL revision.

Radiographic Investigation of Coronal Plane and Patellar Height and Changes Following Tibial Deflection Osteotomy for Correction of Tibial Slope in Combination With ACL Reconstruction

Background: A tibial deflexion osteotomy (TDO) is performed to decrease the sagittal tibial slope to reduce the relative risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) graft failure. Given that coronal plane osteotomies can cause consequential changes in the sagittal plane to patellar height and tibial slope, potential changes to coronal plane alignment and patellar height can result after a sagittal plane osteotomy. Purpose: To compare preoperative and postoperative coronal plane alignment after TDO, as well as to analyze the effect of the osteotomy on patellar height. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This study was conducted on a consecutive series of patients with primary and revision ACLR with concomitant TDO between 2011 and 2022. Inclusion criteria were 1-stage autograft ACLR combined with supratubercular TDO with pre- and 3 months postoperative radiographs of sufficient quality. Indications for TDO were anterior instability requiring ACL revision surgery and a posterior tibial slope (PTS) >9° or a PTS >14° in the primary ACL surgery patients. Anteroposterior and lateral knee radiographs were reviewed, and the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), PTS, Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), and modified Insall-Salvati ratio were measured directly from the radiographs by 2 independent reviewers. Results: A total of 68 patients were included in this study. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were performed 1 month before and 3 months after surgery, respectively. There was a significant increase in the mean MPTA of 0.95° varus (SD, 2.1°; range, increase of 4.23° valgus to increase of 7.74° varus; P < .01), a decreased PTS of 8.86° (SD, 3.03°; P < .01), and an increased CDI of 0.08 (range, decrease of 0.27 to increase of 0.64) (P < .01; SD, 0.17) in patients undergoing TDO. Insall-Salvati ratio measurements showed no difference. There was good intra- and interobserver reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.97 and 0.91 for MPTA, 0.97 and 0.87 for PTS, 0.87 and 0.93 for CDI, and 0.88 and 0.76 the Insall-Salvati ratio. Conclusion: This study, the largest series on TDO for ACLR, demonstrates that the TDO can be performed safely without large changes to coronal alignment or patellar height. The tibial slope was reduced by a mean of 8.86° (range, 2.3°-11.5°; P < .01). The TDO produces a small statistically significant change to coronal alignment, inducing a mean increased varus of <1° and an increased patellar height of 0.1 CDI. Therefore, TDO can be performed safely without dramatic changes to coronal alignment or patellar height, this study highlights technical aspects to minimize iatrogenic varus.

Application of multiplanar reconstruction and 3D printing in anterior cruciate ligament revision.

Anterior cruciate ligament injury is the most common type of knee joint ligament injury. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has a high failure rate, with bone tunnel abnormalities as the most significant factor in these failures. Digital orthopedic technology can effectively develop implementation plans for the revision, thus increasing the success rate. This study aims to develop a surgical plan for anterior cruciate ligament revision by employing multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) for measuring bone tunnel position and diameter, and simulating bone tunnel creation via 3D printing preoperatively. A total of 12 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament revision at the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between 2014 and 2021 were retrospectively studied. The data included patient demographics, preoperative formulated knee joint 3D printing models, and preoperative knee CT scans. The study measured the bone tunnel's diameter and position to guide the establishment of revision bone tunnels during surgery, reassessed the postoperative bone tunnels, and evaluated knee joint functional scores [including International Knee Documentation Committee Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner exercise level score]. Preoperative measurements revealed suboptimal femoral tunnels positions in 4 patients and tibial tunnels positions in 2 patients. MPR and 3D printing technology were used to guide the establishment of a new bone canal during surgery, and postoperative measurements were satisfactory for all patients. Preoperative measurements demonstrated the interclass correlation coefficient for femoral tunnels and tibial tunnels diameters were 0.843 (P<0.05) and 0.889 (P<0.001), respectively. Meanwhile, the intraclass correlation coefficient were 0.811 (P<0.05) and 0.784 (P<0.05), respectively. The intraoperative diameter of femoral and tibial tunnels showed excellent correlation with postoperative CT measurements, with intraclass correlation coefficient values of 0.995 (P<0.001) and 0.987 (P<0.001), respectively. All bone tunnel positions were within the normal range. At the final follow-up, knee joint function scores in all 12 patients improved significantly compared to pre-surgery (P<0.001), and the reoperation rate was zero. MPR and 3D printing technology can accurately measure the parameters of reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament bone tunnels. Personalized revision plans for patients with reconstruction failure enhances the success rate of revision surgery and improves patient prognosis.

Intra- and interobserver reliability of two classification systems for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures in the setting of an ACL rupture

BackgroundPosterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures occur frequently associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Some authors advocate operative treatment of high-grade impaction fractures, which has led to the development of classification systems. Our study aims (1) to describe and compare the intra- and interobserver reliability of the two most used classifications and (2) to assess correlations between the grade of bony posterolateral tibial injury, patient characteristics and short-to mid-term revision rate after ACL reconstruction. Materials and methodsIn a retrospective series of 163 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, two reviewers independently evaluated the preoperative MRI scans. Conform the Menzdorf and Bernholt classification the presence and grade of an associated posterolateral impaction fracture were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed to test for both study hypotheses. Results171 primary ACL cases were evaluated. Mean follow-up time was 41 months (range 12–154, SD = 17.1). Mean age was 32 years (range 13–59, SD = 12). Posterolateral impaction fractures were present in 111 (64.9 %) and 120 (70.0 %) cases, according to the Menzdorf and Bernholt classification. A Segond fracture was present in 19 (11.1 %) cases. Kappa value was 0.47 for intra- and 0.52 for the interobserver reliability for the Menzdorf classification (moderate reliability). For the Bernholt classification kappa values were 0.66 and 0.61, respectively (good reliability). A Segond fracture correlated significantly with the presence of a posterolateral impaction fracture (p < 0.05). A significant association was present between patients necessitating ACL revision surgery and patients for whom operative intervention for the posterolateral impression was advised following the Menzdorf classification (p < 0.001). ConclusionInter- and intraobserver reliability testing for classifying posterolateral tibial fractures resulted in moderate to good reliability. High-grade posterolateral tibial fractures should be identified, selective treatment should be considered as they are associated with higher revision rates after ACL reconstruction if left untreated.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Modern Augmented ACL Repair and Autograft ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been the gold standard for primary ACL rupture since the 1990s. In the past decade, ACL repair has received renewed attention and increased research. To compare the clinical outcomes of modern augmented ACL repair versus autograft reconstruction for ACL ruptures. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. A search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted for prospective or retrospective comparative studies published between January 1, 2010, and January 3, 2023, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and methodological quality assessment. Sensitivity analysis was performed to maintain the stability of results. Nine studies were included (minimum follow-up period, 24-60 months). The total sample size was 833 patients (augmented repair group: 358 patients; autograft ACL reconstruction group: 475 patients). There were 4 randomized controlled trials (level 1), 1 prospective comparative study (level 2), 2 retrospective comparative studies (level 3), and 2 case-control studies (level 3). The augmented ACL repair group attained significantly higher Lysholm score (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-3.01; P = .03) and hamstring strength (WMD = 36.69; 95% CI, 29.07-44.31; P < .01) but had higher rates of hardware removal (odds ratio [OR] = 6.30; 95% CI, 2.44-16.23; P = .0001), reoperation (OR = 1.87; 95% CI, 1.33-2.62; P = .0003), and failure (OR = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.03-2.43; P = .0003) compared with the autograft ACL reconstruction group. No significant differences were observed between the repair and reconstruction groups regarding postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Tegner scores, knee laxity, satisfaction, ACL revisions, complications, and reoperation rather than revision. Augmented ACL repair was associated with higher rates of reoperation, hardware removal, and failure compared with autograft ACL reconstruction in studies with minimum 2-year follow-up data. However, augmented ACL repair had higher Lysholm scores and hamstring strength versus autograft ACL reconstruction.

Achilles Allograft Fiber Track Graft Preparation Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament rupture is a common orthopaedic injury, with reconstruction the treatment of choice for active individuals. Graft selection is an important consideration for surgical planning. Achilles tendon allograft is a graft choice most likely used in cases of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. This technical note discusses an approach to Achilles tendon allograft preparation that respects and follows the rotation of the fibers of the Achilles tendon. Key considerations in the use of this technique include (1) identifying the rotational fiber tracks, (2) performing careful dissection along the identified tracks of the fibers, and (3) ensuring an appropriate graft width based on patient size, all of which are crucial for the success of this unique technique. The preservation of the rotational fibers provided by this technique may have the potential to result in increased tensile strength and better clinical outcomes.

Single- or two-stage revision after failed ACL reconstruction: No differences in re-revision rates and clinical outcomes.

The surgeons' choice of a single-stage or a two-stage procedure in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr) is based on the possibility of reuse of the tibia and femoral bone tunnels after primary ACLr. The purpose of this study was to compare failure rates and clinical outcomes following single-stage and two-stage ACL revisions in a cohort of patients from The Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry. Patients identified from 2005 to 2022 with ACL revision and met the following criteria: minimum 2-year follow-up, isolated ACL revision and registered single- or two-stage ACL revision. The primary outcome was ACL re-revision rate. Secondary outcomes were arthrometer sagittal knee laxity (side-to-side difference) and pivot shift (rotational stability difference) evaluated at 1-year follow up. One thousand five hundred seventy-four ACL revisions were included in the study (1331 = single-stage and 243 = two stage). Baseline characteristics showed no difference in relation to age, gender, knee laxity, pivot shift, meniscus injury, cartilage damage or injury mechanism between the two groups. Significant differences were found in relation to the type of graft. No statistical difference in 2-years revision rates between single-stage group 2.79 (95% CI 2.03-3.84) and two-stage group 2.93 (95% CI 1.41-6.05) was found. No significant difference was seen in knee laxity and pivot shift between stage-groups at 1-year follow up. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in knee stability from baseline to 1-year follow-up. The present study found that ACL revision outcomes were similar in terms of rerevision rates and knee laxity for patients managed with a single- or a two-stage surgical strategy. Level III.

The Original Technique for Tibial Deflexion Osteotomy During Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Surgical Technique

The original technique for tibial deflexion osteotomy (TDO) was first described by Henri Dejour during the Lyon knee meeting in 1991 to reduce excessive posterior tibial slope during second revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The technique is nowadays increasingly performed during first-revision ACLR in patients at risk for graft retear. This Technical Note describes and updates the original TDO technique.